The Project Manager, when assessing compensation events, has referred to the switch date from actual and forecast costs for a compensation event under Option A.
There was never an instruction, just a document transmittal. Eventually we raised an NCE which was accepted. Looking at the guidance notes, the switch date would be the date the communication was sent, not the notification date. The PM are saying it's the notification date.
The guidance notes does not specifically refer to time but refers to the cost. Am i right in saying that an impacted programme should use the same "Switch" date? I would then progress everything up to the switch date and forecast after that.
As per usual, we are doing this after the event has already passed so I'm ignoring what has actuallly happened in terms of time. I know there has been some legal cases on prospective/retrospective claims but the focus was on the cost rather than time so i can't take this information on aboard in making my case.
There was never an instruction, just a document transmittal. Eventually we raised an NCE which was accepted. Looking at the guidance notes, the switch date would be the date the communication was sent, not the notification date. The PM are saying it's the notification date.
The guidance notes does not specifically refer to time but refers to the cost. Am i right in saying that an impacted programme should use the same "Switch" date? I would then progress everything up to the switch date and forecast after that.
As per usual, we are doing this after the event has already passed so I'm ignoring what has actuallly happened in terms of time. I know there has been some legal cases on prospective/retrospective claims but the focus was on the cost rather than time so i can't take this information on aboard in making my case.